Share via
ShawNshawN
  • Home
  • Tips
  • Videos
  • Clients
  • Blog
  • Events
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Shop

Review of Bad Times at the El Royale movie

10/17/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
Rating: R, Time: 2hr 21min, Director: Drew Goddard, Cast on IMDb

So how is this movie shot?

This film has an interesting mix of a Pulp Fiction style editing cut mixed in with a mystery like Mystery on the Orient Express.  So I think there is a real fun element of different plot lines run in different sections of the movie that become more relevant as the movie progresses. Another stylistic choice was the movie is shot more like a 60s film with a theatre feel.  There is much less music in the background than a typical Hollywood production, which is nice, but leads to scenes that can be a bit dead.  One of the advantages of the slow, music free scenes is there is a lot of suspense and disorientation with a bang for a lot of surprise kills.
Picture
So who was the villain in the film?

That's the really bizarre part in the film. The more the film progresses, the more the movie goes in all types of directions and characters true nature is revealed over time that is very surprising.  The only non-surprising character may have been Darlene Sweet, who is a singer, who is on the way to a gig with a sorted past of a missed opportunity.  A vacuum cleaner salesman Seymour Sullivan, who is obnoxious shows up and then starts to find multiple bugs in his room.  It is the trigger of the film that all is not what it seems at the hotel split between California and Nevada. 
Picture
All the characters are very well defined in the film, which adds a lot to the movie, since you tend to like all the characters and aren't sure who is the hero and villain. Some of the characters switch sides, so you go from liking them, to fearing them to later sympathizing with them.  Another great point in the film is random people you think are the heroes end up getting killed, almost pointlessly.  Of course, hence the name "bad times.."
What would you have changed in the film?

Although I liked the silence in the film, I'm not sure some scenes warranted that much silence.  For other scenes, the silence really built up the tension to a surprise turn in the film.  So its a tough call on that editing choice.  Some elements worked really well like secret areas of the hotel that get revealed, but get used for several scenes.  I think just using it in 1-2 scenes would have been much more effective.  Some of the flashback scenes work and others just don't add much to the plot as far as the point to them.  So I would tighten this part to where their skills made a difference in the plot.  Overall, it is an enjoyable, quirky film.  I think maybe shortening or working on some better dialogue would have sharpened the film possibly. 
Please share via Facebook or Twitter!
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    BLOG

    Master video with my recommendated gear:
    My Vlog Gear

    Archives

    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    June 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    September 2014

    Categories

    All
    Artist Interview
    Art Tourism
    Movie Review

    RSS Feed